The intellectual community’s views on scientific process and the general handling of issues of truth, which effect many social institutions including justice, generally suffer from incompleteness, focusing on particular aspects of scientific process but failing to take all the aspects of science and truth together to develop a complete and unified picture. Not only is it necessary to understand the nature of truth and the processes of induction, deduction and hypothesis, but it is also necessary to understand there relation to observations, generalizations and explanations, and to understand the effects of probability of truth, to understand beliefs, leads, and open-mindedness. When all these aspects are taken together they produce an image of scientific/intellectual process that is quite sophisticated, that fits well with the methods of successful scientists and with the acceptance or rejection, often falsely, of knowledge by society.
The Sciences development began in early 1915 when Quantum era found by Einstein. From all of these inventions by the scientists, electronics device began emerge, such as : Television, MP3, Handphone, Internet, etc. These are the based people on to continually think about stuffs that can ease their daily activities. Nowadays, many industries that prefer to accept science research which can give advantages of social community. People just want to think instantly and how their activities done easily and quickly. People rely on trust to make science practical. It is this reliance on trust that is the reason most experiments are never repeated. So, It is not wrong that theoritical scientific research is only worthwhile if it has practical applications for industry and for society as a whole, because it is more commercial and can develop economic country aspects.
On the other hand, there are still few of scientist that have idealism to keep the “sacred of science”. Many experiments require great talent, skill, time, and patience to carry out. The issues above, believed be many intellectuals that an experiment is scientific only if it is repeatable, but of course, in fact, few experiments that are considered to be scientific are ever repeated. However, true scientists know that that the experiment worked once is enough to make the statement the experiment was based on a lead. The only thing that matters is whether those serious researchers trust the experimenter’s truthfulness and ability enough to conclude that the researcher actually did see something.
No comments:
Post a Comment